helix-mirror/runtime/queries/c/indents.scm

52 lines
1.4 KiB
Scheme
Raw Normal View History

2022-03-30 19:08:07 +04:00
[
(compound_statement)
(declaration_list)
2022-03-30 19:08:07 +04:00
(field_declaration_list)
(enumerator_list)
(parameter_list)
(init_declarator)
(expression_statement)
] @indent
[
"case"
"}"
"]"
")"
2022-03-30 19:08:07 +04:00
] @outdent
(if_statement
consequence: (_) @indent
(#not-kind-eq? @indent "compound_statement")
(#set! "scope" "all"))
(while_statement
body: (_) @indent
(#not-kind-eq? @indent "compound_statement")
(#set! "scope" "all"))
(do_statement
body: (_) @indent
(#not-kind-eq? @indent "compound_statement")
(#set! "scope" "all"))
(for_statement
")"
(_) @indent
(#not-kind-eq? @indent "compound_statement")
(#set! "scope" "all"))
(parameter_list
. (parameter_declaration) @anchor
(#set! "scope" "tail")) @align
(argument_list
. (_) @anchor
(#set! "scope" "tail")) @align
; These are a bit opinionated since some people just indent binary/ternary expressions spanning multiple lines.
; Since they are only triggered when a newline is inserted into an already complete binary/ternary expression,
; this should happen rarely, so it is not a big deal either way.
; Additionally, adding these queries has the advantage of preventing such continuation lines from being used
; as the baseline when the `hybrid` indent heuristic is used (which is desirable since their indentation is so inconsistent).
(binary_expression
(#set! "scope" "tail")) @anchor @align
(conditional_expression
"?" @anchor
(#set! "scope" "tail")) @align